Low Turnout Should Not Mean No Vote!

Why at a time of increasing disengagement from the political process in a democratic society, are British citizens in general not more actively encouraged, or indeed inspired in the case of the younger generation, to vote?

In the case of British citizens overseas, the cost element and lack of knowledge of this particular voter base would appear major reasons for the lack of direct outreach programmes and associated canvassing, to improve turnout levels for those still qualified to vote within the current 15-year-limit.

Indeed, the latest example of likely low turnout from the effect of a lack of engagement with the British electorate, would seem to concern the new elections planned in November for Police & Crime Commissioners (PCCs) and for which the Electoral Reform Society is currently projecting a turnout of less than 20%.This would be even less than the poor turnout of 31% for the local elections in May, which itself was down from the  35% turnout in 2008 (see 2012-English-locals-election-report-web of the Electoral Commission).

The PCC election process, therefore, does not currently present a good example of local democracy in action unless actual voter turnout levels on the day prove otherwise. As for the May 2012 local government elections, however, should turnout again be poor the local electorate will still live with the “democratic” outcome; they will keep their democratic right to choose to vote or not, irrespective of turnout levels.

It seems illogical then that the current low turnout level of British voters overseas, for which the postal vote has been determined as inadequate, is still used as an excuse to disenfranchise those who want to continue to vote (eg by proxy) in UK national elections, even after 15 years abroad.   

If you agree, please demonstrate this by voting your support in our on-line poll here.

You can also register to vote (if still qualified under the 15-year-rule ) via the Electoral Commisson website  www.aboutmyvote.co.uk.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in +5 million British Expats Abroad, Democracy in Terminal Decline, Electoral Commission, Improving Overseas Reg/voting Rates, Lord Lexden Continues Challenge, Lord Lexden-Overseas Voter Discrimination, Low Turnout - Not No Vote, MPs Letter to Constituent, Older Generation More Impacted, Outdated Objections to Voters Overseas, Overseas Voter Turnout:UKvsUS, Two Overseas Voting Issues for Lords, Voting Rights, Younger Generation Voters. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Low Turnout Should Not Mean No Vote!

  1. J. A. Bosworth says:

    The ‘low turn out’ argument is invalid. The current law makes it difficult for expats to register but, when they do, it then removes them from the registers. If low ‘turn out’ were the criterion, there wouldn’t be elections in the UK. The Electoral Registration Bill is intended to increase registration and turn out/participation, but the 15 Year Rule acts in exactly the opposite way by reducing both registration and turn out/participation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s